Background: The
Land and the Neighbourhood
1965: The Province of Alberta
established University of Calgary and gifted it with the main campus plus
184 acres of "Education Reserve Land" or "University Endowment
Lands" in anticipation of future growth, after a very expensive experience
in buying back developed land in Edmonton for the University of Alberta's
expansion.
At roughly the same time, construction started on the adjacent University
Heights subdivision, large homes restricted by City by-law to single-family
occupancy. |
In February 1995, the Alberta government
announced that 84 acres of the Education Reserve Lands would be deeded
outright to the University of Calgary, and the remaining 100 acres would
be sold, in order to help pay down the deficit. University Heights Community
Association spearheaded a protest that was quickly joined by residents
of Varsity, Parkdale, Montgomery, and St Andrews – all insisting
that the entire site be maintained for its original purpose, of
providing space for the University’s educational expansion. Six weeks after
its first announcement, the province retracted its plan. |
On March 28, 1995, the province
transferred the entire site to the University, with a covenant that
the land would be used only for University purposes. (See
Land Transfer agreement.) Willy-nilly, UHCA took stewardship
of the Education Reserve Lands. Most residents still feel a responsibility
to ensure that the land is used for University purposes only. |
Background: Friendly
University-UHCA relations
On November 24, 1999, Barry
Kowalsky, Director of Campus Planning for the University of Calgary, attended
a UHCA Board of Directors meeting and described the University’s plans
for campus development. These included expanding the medical faculty
on the Foothills site; expansion of communication and information services
programs in a 150,000 sq ft facility near the engineering building; and
proposed expansion of the Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation centre. In
response to UHCA concerns about traffic and parking, and about preserving
the endowment lands, he suggested the formation of a Community Advisory
Board to monitor plans and pass along concerns. Craig McDougall was already
serving as UHCA rep in Community Advisory meetings and agreed to continue
with this role. UHCA Board minutes show that, “Barry assured
us that UHCA would receive copies of any plans or development permits and
he stressed his intention to keep UHCA up to date and consult with
us and other interested groups regarding traffic issues etc.” |
In early December 1999, UHCA received
word that the the Community Lottery Board had approved the University's
application for funds to construct an international sized grass soccer
pitch -- an application for which UHCA wrote a letter of support. "We know
that this support impressed the Community Lottery Board," Calgary Dinosaurs
Soccer Club president Gordon Franson wrote to UHCA, in a letter dated December
8, 1999. In February, UHCA wrote to Barry Kowalksi to request
a copy of the soccer field site plans and remind him that UHCA expected
to use the fields for community-sponsored events. |
The first announcement?
On April 11, 2000, the University
of Calgary issued a Backgrounder document announcing it was considering
a “Research Transition Facility” with Calgary Laboratory Services as
an “anchor tenant”. The Backgrounder mentioned in passing that this
new facility would be built “on approximately 8 acres on the southeast
intersection of 32nd Ave NW and Shaganappi Trail.” That location would
put it on the Education Reserve Lands, although the Backgrounder didn’t
exactly say that. (Read the
Backgrounder document and try to deduce the location or purpose of
the proposed building.) |
A
media release, also dated April 11, states that, “The
university will be hosting a series of community discussion sessions during
the coming weeks to allow members of the campus and surrounding communities
to learn more about the proposal, ask questions, and give their feedback.”
And the University’s spokesperson is quoted as assuring the public that,
"The local community associations have a very important role to play in
this proposal and we look forward to working closely with them during the
coming weeks." In fact, the University's first public meetings on this
issue were held the end of May, after UHCA held its own meetings. |
On April 17, the Backgrounder appeared,
practically word-for-word, as an
article in the University Gazette.
The University is free to use its own
written material in its own publications at any time, of course. What is
remarkable about this particular document is how little information it
actually conveys. Compare the
CLS description of its needs with the University’s description of the
proposed RTF. Confusing? Now, recall the Land Transfer Agreement convenant,
which stipulates that the land can only be used for University purposes,
"including but not limited to playing fields, residences, academic and
research buildings". What's wrong with this picture? |
Surprise! The UHCA
Annual Meeting
At the April 19 UHCA Annual General
Meeting, UHCA Development Officer Craig McDougall told 85 local
residents that the proposed "RTF" project would be the Calgary Laboratory
Services central or “core” processing laboratory for all patient
specimens collected in Calgary and area hospitals, and at 24 CLS specimen-collection
sites around the city. On the whole, the meeting reacted angrily
to the announcement of the proposed facility, which was the first time
that most people in attendance (even those who work or study at the University)
had heard about it. |
The Annual Meeting gave the Board a
mandate to organize community response to the proposed project. Although
a few UH residents supported the idea of a CLS lab on that site, most who
voiced their opinions at the AGM expressed opposition. Among people's objections
were:
-
CLS is a commercial facility,
and the Education Reserve Land is intended for U of C academic expansion;
-
the U of C is still in the process
of drawing up its own campus plan, which won't be ready for 12 to 18 months;
-
couriers carrying biological specimens
would be driving through UH twenty-four hours a day, from Foothills Hospital
to the new CLS lab;
-
if the U of C lets CLS build a core
lab on the grasslands, then the Children's Hospital will almost inevitably
follow, and UH will be swallowed up in a giant medical complex;
-
new roads will be required, probably
including a road up the hill from Shaganappi Trail, connecting to Collegiate
Drive, and from there to 24th Ave;
-
the CRHA has no plan; it sold or destroyed
usable hospital structures without a plan, and now it wants to build new
facilities without a plan.
|
UHCA and Community
reaction
On May 5, 6, and 7, UHCA blanketed
the UH community with a newsletter that described the information
provided to the annual meeting, and the AGM’s response to the news. The
newsletter included the University’s backgrounder, the map
of the proposed site provided by the University (see Appendix A of
term sheet), and a form letter which UH residents who opposed the proposed
project could use to notify the University and elected officials of their
objections. |
On May 24, UHCA held a Town Hall
meeting at University Elementary School. As reported elsewhere on this
website, more than 200 people attended, and peppered the panelists with
questions. Audience members arrived with their own perspectives and questions,
responded to presentations from the panelists, and raised questions based
upon background sheets prepared by UHCA. University staff handed out some
information and invitations to its own Open Houses the following week. |
The following week, CBC radio's
EyeOpener program featured reports and "Talkback" response for several
days. Other news media covered the issue. Dozens of UH residents reported
that they had mailed letters to MLA Murray Smith or to the University Board
of Governors, as the newsletter requested. A few reported that they had
received responses. |
On May 26, the University
held an Open House on campus community planning, on campus, to inform University
staff, faculty and students about the CLS lab and sketch out other campus
plans. |
On May 29, and May 30, the University
held Open Houses at Varsity Community Centre and at University Elementary
School. These presentations differed somewhat from the written materials
that had been available previously. Also, the University announced
a
special Web page about the proposed facility. |
The following week, the University
uploaded new information to the new Web page, such as a copy of the "term
sheet" between the University and the CRHA, and the long-promised traffic
study. Also, there is a
new site plan. |
CRHA has to
decide whether and where to build a new Alberta Children’s Hospital. CRHA
and CLS dropped plans to build the new lab on the Parkdale location because
Colonel Belcher Hospital will move there, and local residents convinced
CRHA that was too much density for one location. UHCA residents wonder
: If the Lab is approved first, would the ACH be far behind? Either the
CRHA should announce the ACH's new location first, or else both projects
should be on the table at the same time. |
The University still
has not posted its policy on "partnerships". This facility was first proposed
as 85% commercial content. Many commercial operations would love
to build on the Reserve Lands, centrally-located and free from property
taxes. As one questioner asked at the UHCA Town Hall, "Do we want to be
known as the University of Calgary Educational and Commercial Enterprises,
Inc?" |
The University's
overall campus plan is still in its very early stages. The U of C itself
says that a Community Plan "avoids waste and disruption from piecemeal
projects" and "establishes realistic schedules and capital budgets." |
The province is
drafting a new "Biomedical Waste Management Regulation” with implications
for all laboratories in Alberta. Is it wise to build a new central
lab before those regulations are complete? |
How big would the
lab be and who would use what space?
April 11 Backgrounder
states
that the facility would be 145,000 square feet, with an option to expand
by another 30,000 sq ft. The University would use 25,000 square feet. |
May 15 Gazette
article also states that the University would use 25,000
sq ft of the proposed new 145,000 sq ft lab. |
May 29 “Rumours
and Facts” sheet presents this as “fact”: “The RTF is currently planned
to be 170,000 square feet, of which approximately 50,000 square feet is
to house U of C researchers.” This would be more like 30% of the facility
for U of C purposes. Where this change fits in with the “term sheet” specifications,
or whether it would affect the 30,000 sq ft expansion, is not clear. |
May 29 University Open House presentation
suggests that fewer than 15% of people in the new lab daily would
be U of C personnel: "The facility will be home to approximately 400 CLS
staff...An estimated 60 U of C researchers will also use the RTF each day".
That works out to 87% CLS staff (400/460 people) and 13% U of C researchers
(60/460 people). |